Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2171 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$36.09 vs CA$1149.12
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-4300 - 165 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 24 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76975 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
165
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76975 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |