Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1752 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$36.09 vs CA$1393.07
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 9% better in Apex Legends than FX-4300 - 278 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76811 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
278
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76812 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |