Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 2244 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 125 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than FX-4130 - 122 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 28 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Core i9-9940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i9-9940X |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 28 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
