Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2646 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 15% better in No Man's Sky than FX-4130 - 180 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 64 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$2000
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,000 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76802 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Zambezi | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |