Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3782 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 15% better in Dead Space than FX-4130 - 166 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 32 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$969.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75762 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |