Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 2364 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 18% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-4100 - 517 vs 439 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i3-8100T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
