Buy on Amazon
CA$799
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $699
Availability
MSRP in USD: $699
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4102 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 33% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-4100 - 423 vs 317 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
423
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$799
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD RYZEN 9 7950X3D, Without Cooler
Buy for CA$799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
