Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 267 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 128 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 3% better in Halo Infinite than EPYC 7742 - 164 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 65 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
164
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$418.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$418.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17966 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 10 |
128 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |