Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Core i5-8259U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 489 days newer than Core i5-8259U.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-8259U - 197 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8259U - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8259U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-8259U
Mobile • Apr 5th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i5-8259U |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2018 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1356 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 225 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Plus |
| No | Overclockable | No |
