Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 946 days newer than Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Core i5-7500T - 186 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 35 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
182
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$92.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$92.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10443 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |