Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Core i5-7500 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 946 days newer than Core i5-7500.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500 - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 65 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-7500
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i5-7500 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
