Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 492 days older than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 96% better in Diablo IV than EPYC 7742 - 157 vs 80 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 35 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i3-8100T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 225 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
