Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 729 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 19% better in Counter-Strike 2 than EPYC 7551P - 349 vs 294 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
349
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$251.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$251.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Naples | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |