Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1650 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield V than EPYC 7551P - 265 vs 228 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i5-12400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Naples | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
