Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551 outperforms Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551 is 1123 days newer than Pentium G3258.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Performs up to 12% better in War Thunder than Pentium G3258 - 154 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
613
65.07430997876857%
Multi-Core
1074
18.074722315718613%
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Pentium |
| Naples | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
