Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 98 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than EPYC 7551 - 152 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 91 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i3-8350K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Naples | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
