Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551 is 2087 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Performs up to 179% better in League of Legends than FX-4100 - 145 vs 52 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 95 vs 180 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| EPYC | Collection | FX |
| Naples | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
