Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms EPYC 7402 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 820 days newer than EPYC 7402.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7402
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 48 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than EPYC 7402 - 284 vs 246 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7402 - 125 vs 180 Watts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
284
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$408.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$408.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7402 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
48 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |