Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i7-4702MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 2263 days newer than Core i7-4702MQ.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 1% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i7-4702MQ - 114 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4702MQ - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702MQ
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 37 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i7-4702MQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4702MQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Single-Core
949
84.58110516934046%
Multi-Core
2923
35.76847772883015%
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i7-4702MQ |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 27th, 2013 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rome | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 37 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
