Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 2823 days newer than Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-3960X - 222 vs 216 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3960X - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 130 vs 155 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
216
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$500
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$500 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10256 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Rome | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 130 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |