Buy on Amazon
CA$418.54
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 267 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than EPYC 7282 - 182 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$418.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$418.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13790 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
