Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 820 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600K - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EPYC 7282 - 210 vs 182 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
210
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$244.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$244.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5995 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |