Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1248 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Alan Wake 2 than Athlon 3000G - 110 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
81.10169491525424%
Multi-Core
1975
36.04014598540146%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Athlon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
