Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1141 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 39% better in Dota 2 than Athlon 3000G - 259 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
35.26160648489315%
Multi-Core
1975
12.023621088518203%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
