Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1603 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 12% better in War Thunder than Athlon 3000G - 173 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for CA$234.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75236 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
74.0139211136891%
Multi-Core
1975
47.70531400966183%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |