Buy on Amazon
CA$114.21
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600K outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8600K is 776 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 19% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Athlon 3000G - 125 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core i5-8600K 3.6 Ghz 6-Core Lga 1151 Processor 3.6 BX80684I58600K
Buy for CA$114.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74831 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i5-8600K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
61.901681759379045%
Multi-Core
1975
35.28676076469537%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Athlon 3000G or Core i5-8600K
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales, 1920 x 1080, Very High
1 FPS
CA$639.99/FPS
Radeon RX 580
Athlon 3000G
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
CA$639.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
