Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2634 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-3240 - 229 vs 224 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Picasso | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
