Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1051 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 5% better in Far Cry 5 than Celeron G3930 - 197 vs 187 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
63.53187042842215%
Multi-Core
1043
52.810126582278485%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
| Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
