Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2180 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1820 - 163 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
51.306165099268554%
Multi-Core
825
41.77215189873418%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
| Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
