Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 832 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 3% better in Far Cry 5 than Athlon 3000G - 203 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76518 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
81.72502134927413%
Multi-Core
1975
26.19710836981032%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |