Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 27 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$78.5 vs CA$726.1
- Up to 89% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$0.48 vs CA$4.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 4% better in No Man's Sky than Athlon 200GE - 172 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 24 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
165
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$78.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$78.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
172
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.22/FPS
11%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |