Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms PC fisso on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 379% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than PC fisso - 201 vs 42 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
4th Variation
49th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
Radeon RX 580
8 GB GDDR5 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.88 GPixel/s
15%
Texel Fillrate
193 GTexel/s
24%
49th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i9-10900KF
3.7 GHz | 10-core
Single-Core
1763
57%
Multi-Core
9154
44%
49th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
PC fisso Computer PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-10900KF | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
Radeon RX 580 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |