Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — STGAubron outperforms the more expensive MSI Codex R on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of STGAubron Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 2050% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than MSI Codex R - 43 vs 2 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than MSI Codex R - CA$1429.99 vs CA$4097.57
- Up to 98% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than MSI Codex R - CA$33.26 vs CA$2048.78 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Dec 10th, 2020
FPS
2
4%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2048.78/FPS
1%
Price, CA$
CA$4097.57
34%
Buy for CA$4,097.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
43
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$33.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1429.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,429.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Dec 10th, 2020
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Dec 10th, 2020
GeForce RTX 2060
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
80.64 GPixel/s
48%
Texel Fillrate
201.6 GTexel/s
63%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Dec 10th, 2020
Core i7-10700F
2.9 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1612
74%
Multi-Core
7231
78%
14th Variation
Core i9-11900F
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2171
100%
Multi-Core
9171
100%
CPU Winner
MSI Codex R Gaming Desktop PC | vs | STGAubron Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10700F | CPU | Core i9-11900F |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
