Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Warcraft than Memory - 200 vs 186 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Memory PC
392nd Variation
Captiva PC
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Memory PC
392nd Variation
Radeon RX 6700
10 GB GDDR6 | 160-bit
Pixel Fillrate
156.8 GPixel/s
99%
Texel Fillrate
352.8 GTexel/s
77%
GPU Winner
Captiva PC
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Memory PC
392nd Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
4.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2719
100%
Multi-Core
15172
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| Radeon RX 6700 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
