Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Memory Gaming PC
- Performs up to 136% better in Starfield than EMCA4 - 52 vs 22 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Memory Gaming PC
6th Variation
EMCA4 Computer PC
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Memory Gaming PC
6th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
40%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
32%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Memory Gaming PC
6th Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2402
100%
Multi-Core
11831
100%
CPU Winner
Memory Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1000 GB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
