Key Differences
In short — Veno Scorp outperforms MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Veno Scorp Gaming PC
- Performs up to 219% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 - 201 vs 63 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
2nd Variation
21st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
30%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
19%
21st Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-12400
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2179
70%
Multi-Core
8847
42%
21st Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC | vs | Veno Scorp Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-12400 | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |