Key Differences
In short — HAJAAN CYCLONIA Tower outperforms the cheaper Acer Nitro 50 N50 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Acer Nitro 50 N50 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of HAJAAN CYCLONIA Gaming Tower PC
- Performs up to 149% better in F1 22 than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - 167 vs 67 FPS
Advantages of Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 60% cheaper than HAJAAN CYCLONIA Tower - CA$999.0 vs CA$2499.99
- Up to 0% better value when playing F1 22 than HAJAAN CYCLONIA Tower - CA$14.91 vs CA$14.97 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
2nd Variation
FPS
167
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$14.97/FPS
99.59919839679358%
Price, CA$
CA$2499.99
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 298 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
67
40.119760479041915%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$14.91/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$999
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 297 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
2nd Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
8 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
169.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
339.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
31.359623307828134%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
27.439670394349612%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
100%
CPU Winner
2nd Variation
Core i5-11400F
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1961
89.50251026928343%
Multi-Core
7608
85.38720538720538%
HAJAAN CYCLONIA Gaming Tower PC | vs | Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Core i5-11400F |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
16 GB | RAM | 8 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD |
