Key Differences
In short — ERAZER Bandit P20 outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of ERAZER Bandit P20 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 142% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - 404 vs 167 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
ERAZER Bandit P20 Gaming Desktop PC
3rd Variation
Memory PC
366th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
ERAZER Bandit P20 Gaming Desktop PC
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Memory PC
366th Variation
Radeon RX 6500 XT
4 GB GDDR6 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.08 GPixel/s
74%
Texel Fillrate
180.2 GTexel/s
52%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ERAZER Bandit P20 Gaming Desktop PC
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700F
2.1 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2775
100%
Multi-Core
17332
100%
CPU Winner
ERAZER Bandit P20 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700F | CPU | Ryzen 5 3600 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
