Key Differences
In short — Dell XPS 8960 outperforms the cheaper MSI Codex R2 (Tower) on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MSI Codex R2 (Tower) is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Dell XPS 8960 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 107% better in Starfield than MSI Codex R2 (Tower) - 58 vs 28 FPS
Advantages of MSI Codex R2 (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 52% cheaper than Dell XPS 8960 - CA$1199.0 vs CA$2498.0
- Up to 1% better value when playing Starfield than Dell XPS 8960 - CA$42.82 vs CA$43.07 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
FPS
58
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$43.07/FPS
99.41954957046669%
Price, CA$
CA$2498
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,498 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Sep 1st, 2024 • 3rd Variation
FPS
28
48.275862068965516%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$42.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1199
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
Sep 1st, 2024 • 3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Sep 1st, 2024 • 3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
74.5580808080808%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
51.86649099692578%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
Sep 1st, 2024 • 3rd Variation
Core i5-14400F
2.5 GHz | 10-core
Single-Core
2350
75.78200580457917%
Multi-Core
11359
54.09047619047619%
Dell XPS 8960 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | MSI Codex R2 (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2024 |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Core i5-14400F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 8 TB SSD + 10 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
