Key Differences
In short — DELL Alienware Aurora R16 outperforms Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of DELL Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 14% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - 546 vs 481 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
4th Variation
FPS
546
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
FPS
481
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
69%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
68%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i9-14900F
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3020
100%
Multi-Core
18270
93%
CPU Winner
DELL Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-14900F | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
2 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |