Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms GEEKOM A8 Mini on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 184% better in Dead Space than GEEKOM A8 Mini - 122 vs 43 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Captiva PC
5th Variation
GEEKOM A8 Mini PC
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Captiva PC
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GEEKOM A8 Mini PC
1st Variation
Radeon 780M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
92.8 GPixel/s
44%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
22%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Captiva PC
5th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Captiva PC | vs | GEEKOM A8 Mini PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | Radeon 780M |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
