Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms agando Highend on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 114% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than agando Highend - 94 vs 44 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
143rd Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
143rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
36%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
31%
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
143rd Variation
Core i7-10700KF
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1700
67%
Multi-Core
8083
54%
4th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
agando Highend Gaming PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10700KF | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce RTX 3050 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
