Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - 163 vs 161 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
FPS
161
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS
163
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |