Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 35% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - 342 vs 253 FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
253
74%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS
342
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
45%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
43%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |