Key Differences
In short — Sentinel outperforms Adamant Custom 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Sentinel Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 69% better in World of Tanks than Adamant Custom 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation - 585 vs 346 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
346
59%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
15th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
186.5 GPixel/s
42%
Texel Fillrate
532.8 GTexel/s
41%
15th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
15th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3091
100%
Multi-Core
20685
100%
CPU Winner
Adamant Custom 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation Computer PC | vs | Sentinel Gaming Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-12900K | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
4 TB HDD | Storage | 6 TB HDD |