Key Differences
In short — MSI Notebook outperforms Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing MSI Notebook is 366 days older than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook.
Advantages of MSI Notebook
- Performs up to 27% better in Elden Ring than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - 108 vs 85 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
May 1st, 2023 • 2nd Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 1st, 2023 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
63%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2023 • 2nd Variation
Core i9-12900
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
97%
Multi-Core
11484
88%
MSI Notebook | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
