Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms MSI Notebook on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 851 days newer than MSI Notebook.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 14% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than MSI Notebook - 75 vs 66 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
May 1st, 2024
FPS
75
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Jan 1st, 2022 • 10th Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jan 1st, 2022 • 10th Variation
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
124.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
249.6 GTexel/s
100%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
65%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
98%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 1st, 2022 • 10th Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
96%
Multi-Core
10780
94%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
MSI Notebook | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
