Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MSI GF65 outperforms the more expensive ASUS TUF A17 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MSI GF65 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 28% better in War Thunder than ASUS TUF A17 - 139 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than ASUS TUF A17 - CA$1186.38 vs CA$1456.65
- Up to 36% better value when playing War Thunder than ASUS TUF A17 - CA$8.54 vs CA$13.36 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
1st Variation
FPS
139
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1186.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,186.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74975 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
109
78.41726618705036%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$13.36/FPS
63.92215568862275%
Price, CA$
CA$1456.65
81%
Buy for CA$1,456.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161007 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
1st Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
70.87719298245612%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
56.70175438596491%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i5-10500
3.1 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1519
100%
Multi-Core
5470
100%
CPU Winner
2nd Variation
Ryzen 5 4600H
3.0 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1357
89.33508887425938%
Multi-Core
5046
92.24862888482632%
MSI GF65 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A17 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10500 | CPU | Ryzen 5 4600H |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 17.3" |
