Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MSI GF65 outperforms the cheaper ACEMAGIC 16.1“ on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MSI GF65 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 39% better in War Thunder than ACEMAGIC 16.1“ - 139 vs 100 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing War Thunder than ACEMAGIC 16.1“ - CA$8.54 vs CA$9.0 per FPS
Advantages of ACEMAGIC 16.1“ Laptop
- Up to 24% cheaper than MSI GF65 - CA$899.99 vs CA$1186.38
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
1st Variation
FPS
139
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1186.38
75%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,186.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74979 minutes ago
FPS
100
71.94244604316546%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9/FPS
94.88888888888887%
Price, CA$
CA$899.99
100%
Buy for CA$899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74977 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Radeon Vega 8
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
23.391812865497073%
Texel Fillrate
64 GTexel/s
37.42690058479532%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i5-10500
3.1 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1519
100%
Multi-Core
5470
99.9269272926562%
CPU Winner
MSI GF65 Gaming Laptop | vs | ACEMAGIC 16.1“ Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-10500 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700U |
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
512 GB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |