Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms HP Victus 16 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 787 days newer than HP Victus 16.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 16% better in Far Cry 3 than HP Victus 16 - 148 vs 128 FPS
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
FPS
148
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mar 6th, 2022 • 11th Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Mar 6th, 2022 • 11th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
84%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
70%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Mar 6th, 2022 • 11th Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
96%
Multi-Core
10780
94%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
HP Victus 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
